Legend says that in
the days before Bishop Honorius coaxed St.
John Chrysostom from his solitude to bend his powerful
oratory abilities to the service of the church, another came to visit the
future saint in the cavern of his hermitage…a beautiful young woman fleeing the
dangers of the wild.
Demon or supplicant,
the result was the same.
The saint fell.
As the young woman
grew greater and greater with child, the hermit could no longer face the evidence
of his sins. In his despair, he tried to erase his crime. He threw the mother
of his unborn son from a cliff.
Perhaps it was her
screams, perhaps it was the sight of her body cracking against the rocks, but St. John immediately
understood he had not erased his crime, merely increased it two-fold through
this double murder. He stripped himself naked and threw himself to the ground
vowing to live as an animal, not speaking, nor eating human food, nor looking
up to the heavens until his sins were forgiven.
For months he went on
like this, denying his humanity in penance for his sins until the day came that
God chose to release him from this trial. In his savage state, St. John received again a visitor…a beautiful
young mother suckling her infant child. It was through the mouth of the saint’s
own innocent son that the Lord forgave St.
John Chrysostom his sins and released him to return to
his peaceful mediations.
In turn, the young
woman was finally restored to her parents, the King and Queen, with much
celebration.
So Spake Me…
In Alyse’s first day as a fugitive, she takes refuge in the Church of St. John
the Golden-Mouthed, Venice ’s
relatively small chapel dedicated to this saint. She, too, is betrayed and
turned out in violence. It would be so easy to pick up the feminist themes and
rail against the objectification of women or to point out the unlikelihood of
an unwed mother receiving a joyous welcome on her return to the palace in that
era.
But what caught my eye in each of my sources for this tale
(and there are many versions), what I adjusted in my own retelling, was the
gloss applied to the double-homicide.
Violence in entertainment is always an argument-provoking
topic. Gloss over it too much and you will find yourself accused glorifying the
act, separating it from the consequences. Dig into it too graphically and you
will be grouped with the artists contributing to the desensitization of
society.
Violence whether emotional or physical is part of the human
story. It is the thing we fear in the night; the undercurrent of our own rage. As
much as I was repulsed by the light touch applied to the murder of a girl and
her unborn child, as much as I turn away gore and spatter of the latest summer blockbuster,
I would propose that the spectrum is necessary.
You cannot offer brutal honesty every time without numbing
the masses, but sometimes…sometimes we need to be reminded that what we are
accustomed to seeing has been sanitized, that the effects of a gunshot are
devastating and not just to the body splattered across the bathroom wall, but
also to the community to which that body was connected.
Sometimes we need to be reminded that the young woman dying
of a pierced lung and a cracked skull at the bottom of the cliff will not get
up again and birth a child to offer us forgiveness.
At least not without a miracle…